reconsider...

Thursday, February 23
  emails are hard to read

wired.com relates the results of a study of internet correspondence published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [note my personal opinion: studies and/or papers can be goofy]

the tone of a message can be lost. the reader assumes the tone will be read correctly, the reader often misreads the tone and most alarmingly believe their misreads to be accurate.
The researchers took 30 pairs of undergraduate students and gave each one a list of 20 statements about topics like campus food or the weather. Assuming either a serious or sarcastic tone, one member of each pair e-mailed the statements to his or her partner. The partners then guessed the intended tone and indicated how confident they were in their answers.
Those who sent the messages predicted that nearly 80 percent of the time their partners would correctly interpret the tone. In fact the recipients got it right just over 50 percent of the time.
[snip]
At the same time, those reading messages unconsciously interpret them based on their current mood, stereotypes and expectations. Despite this, the research subjects thought they accurately interpreted the messages nine out of 10 times.
that is a recipe for alotta misunderstandings

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home
whatever pops into my head...but i don't imagine many people will actually see any of this.

Google
e-mail the chumpo
nitish's blogger profile
site feed
Powered by Blogger





archives
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
news/blog links
- kinja
- technorati
- daypop
- blogdex
- boing boing
- fark
- metafilter
- memeorandum
- watching america
- lucianne
- instapundit
- best of the web
- oh, that liberal media
- kaus files
- daily kos
- talking points memo
- wonkette
- scott rosenberg

- mozilla
- bugmenot
- avg anti-virus
- ad-aware