stupid or lying

in an article about a memo that the left will get all huffy about, the ny times apparently believes there were only two iraqi resolutions [bugmenot login]

there were alot more, even after discounting 'extend oil-for-palace' resolutions

judgement: the ny times is stupid for not realizing they are obviously lying
it's shoddy work that leads to phony stories, phony photos, phony pundits...
i could go on, but there are too many phonies over at the NYT

¶ - nitish @ 8:30 AM