not quite 'fake but accurate', but close

speaking of the overall lameness of the pulitzers...

the 'secret cia prison' story that won a pulitzer for is rebutted [bugmenot login] by the EU antiterror chief (found via the ldotters). granted, he uses a rather lofty 'reasonable doubt' standard, but a story that would potentially endanger lives should meet a high standard. critics express outrage citing the relatively low standard of "circumstantial evidence"

update: is this cia firing, reported by fox news (found via memeorandum), related?

¶ - nitish @ 8:53 AM