reconsider...

Wednesday, May 31
  what's in a (stock) name

Princeton psychologists release findings that stocks of companies with 'simple' names outperform those with 'complex' names. the psychologists first furnished a list of fictional names with would-be investors expressing more positive outlooks for 'simple' stocks. given these initial results, an analysis of real world performance yielded similar results.

while this analysis would suggest a KISS investing philosophy, the princetonians sum up with a disclaimer
"It's a very large effect," says Oppenheimer, who reports the work in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. But so far the researchers have only trialled one bunch of stocks, so it is unclear how robust this trend really is. "I'd caution people not to change their portfolio on this basis."
in this investing environment with frothiness, outta control compensation and questionable investing philosophies, companies that come up with wacky names may indicate other problems

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home
whatever pops into my head...but i don't imagine many people will actually see any of this.

Google
e-mail the chumpo
nitish's blogger profile
site feed
Powered by Blogger





archives
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
news/blog links
- kinja
- technorati
- daypop
- blogdex
- boing boing
- fark
- metafilter
- memeorandum
- watching america
- lucianne
- instapundit
- best of the web
- oh, that liberal media
- kaus files
- daily kos
- talking points memo
- wonkette
- scott rosenberg

- mozilla
- bugmenot
- avg anti-virus
- ad-aware