the bogus media reporting of exaggerated and sensational claims became so ingrained in the american psyche that a musician who will be soon forgotten was compelled to ascribe racist tendencies on president bush (crooks and liars has the video).
For example, a comparison of locations where 874 bodies were recovered with U.S. Census tract data indicates that the victims weren't disproportionately poor. Another database, compiled by Knight Ridder of 486 Katrina victims from Orleans and St. Bernard parishes, suggests they also weren't disproportionately African-American.while mother nature didn't discriminate along the lines of poverty and race, the elderly were disproportinially hurt
in the wake of hurricane katrina, the MSM was pretty happy with its coverage of the aftermath including a 're-discovery' of race and poverty. however, it soon became apparent that the media reported exaggerated claims of deaths, crimes and environmental impact. (nevertheless, spike lee still promises his sensationalist take)
From a journalistic point of view, the root causes of the bogus reports were largely the same: The communication breakdown without and especially within New Orleans created an information vacuum in which wild oral rumor thrived. Reporters failed to exercise enough skepticism in passing along secondhand testimony from victims (who often just parroted what they picked up from the rumor mill), and they were far too eager to broadcast as fact apocalyptic statements from government officials—such as Mayor Ray Nagin’s prediction of 10,000 Katrina-related deaths (there were less than 900 in New Orleans at press time) and Police Superintendent Edwin Compass’ reference on The Oprah Winfrey Show to “little babies getting raped”—without factoring in discounts for incompetence and ulterior motives.with the benefit of time and perspective, reason concludes
At the same time, it is plausible that the exaggerations helped make the outside response quicker than it otherwise would have been, potentially saving lives. As with many details of this natural and manmade disaster, we may never know.the unskeptical media envisioning a sensational story partially bares the blame
But in the meantime, truth became a casualty, news organizations that were patting their own backs in early September were publishing protracted mea culpas by the end of the month, and reputation of a great American city has been, at least to some degree, unfairly tarnished.
the la times appears to appear [bugmenot login] genuinely troubled by preliminary election results from iraq.
The myth of a unified Iraqi identity may have finally been laid to rest this month.while these results fall short of optimistic desires for a more national result, the results are not entirely unexpected
More clearly than any other measurement since the U.S.-led 2003 invasion, preliminary results from the Dec. 15 parliamentary elections show Iraq as three lands with three distinct identities, divided by faith, goals, region, history and symbols.
[The preliminary election results] show a nation starkly fragmented into ethnic and religious cantons with different aims and visions.la times staff reporters Borzou Daragahi and Louise Roug invoke the MSM favorite anonymous source
Nine out of 10 Iraqis in the Shiite Muslim provinces of the south voted for religious Shiite parties, according to the early results from the Independent Electoral Commission of Iraq. Nine out of 10 Iraqis in Sunni Muslim Arab areas of central and western Iraq voted for Sunni parties. Nine out of 10 Iraqis in the Kurdish provinces of the north voted for Kurdish candidates.
"Iraq is still very much in a stage of identity politics"despite being only 2 and a half years old, iraqi elections exhibit similar characteristics to american elections, a country 2 and a half centuries old. an examination of a 2004 election breakdown reveals some voting patterns by race, religious affiliation and region demonstrate divisions along "distinct identities, divided by faith, goals, region, history and symbols" that the la times laments in iraq.
i realized the reason the fact that former president bill clinton authorized the rendition program has not made a big splash in the MSM over here...
Michael Vale, who played the Dunkin Donuts baker, passed away on christmas eve.
Phyllis Klingebiel needed a kidney due to a degenerative genetic condition. since no one in her biological family proved to be a match, she faced the prospect of years of dialysis while waiting for a kidney transplant.
"I'm forever indebted to this young man for this gift," Klingebiel told a newspaper, The Star-Ledger of Newark. "He's a walking angel on this Earth."over the past 30 years, Klingebiel along with her husband Herbert took care of 67 foster children. Greshan entered the Klingebiel home at 7 years old, in their care for 11 years
"After six months, I knew this was my home," he said at the Klingebiels' house a day before the operation. "It wasn't 'foster child,' it was `son.'"happynews.com (great idea for a website) serves up a picture of the happy mother and son
cbs-60 minutes-mary mapes-dan rather seemingly introduced the policy of "fake but accurate" during memogate. newsweek dutifully appropriated it during flushgate. the practice, long prevalent in movie pr and science, involves 'molding' facts to comply with a specific viewpoint.
Kennedy, meanwhile, apologized for slandering America's dedicated law-enforcement agents by portraying them as totalitarian thugs....fake but accurate...
Ha ha, we fooled you! Here's the actual Kennedy response as reported by the Globe:
Laura Capps, a Kennedy spokeswoman, said last night that the senator cited "public reports" in his opinion piece. Even if the assertion was a hoax, she said, it did not detract from Kennedy's broader point that the Bush administration has gone too far in engaging in surveillance. [emphasis added]
apparently, the tweaks to the nielsen ratings methodology lead to slower ratings numbers:
my opinion of alotta people in the media is well known: out-of-touch, pessimistic, self-congratulatory (even when unwarranted), whiny...
the ny transit strike appears over.
[T]ere is a class confrontation of a kind going on — but it's not between rich and poor. It's between the working class and what might be called the government-worker class.the strike was essentially well-compensated workers taking an illegal action to garner even better compensation.
The gap between the two groups has been growing for a while.
The private sector has been groaning under rising health and pension costs for years....
Yet the benefits for public-sector workers keep getting fatter and fatter.
The reason is fairly simple. While only 8 percent of private-sector workers are unionized these days, some 40 percent of public-sector workers are unionized. And while the rigors of the free market forced private companies to become more efficient, the government faces no such constraints.
Instead, pliant politicians simply give the unions whatever they want, driving up health and pension costs — and sticking taxpayers (the ones trudging over the Brooklyn Bridge this week) with the bill.
given the questionable nature of studies, i'm always surprised of the preponderance of them.
following the example of some virginia deadbeat dad measures or going old school with the pillory, some european countries may allow music companies to publish names of some some convicted file sharers. to add insult to injury, the repeat offender infringers would be required to pay for the ad space outing their own guilt.
while the WB struggles [bugmenot login], the young man of steel show smallville has bounced back surprisingly well in a seemingly tough time slot.
Instead, in a twist that has surprised the producers and challenged the conventional wisdom of the TV industry, "Smallville" has, in its fifth season, become a standout hit for the WB. The series is having its best season, up 28% compared with last year, with an average of 5.5 million total viewers, according to Nielsen Media Research.the move may have 'helped', but as a fan of the show the 'fortress of solitude' phase of the show deserves credit too.
i mentioned this briefly before, but now details of the integration of pvr use into nielsen ratings become known. nielsen will begin publishing 3 sets of numbers for 'live viewing' / + same day playback / + playback within a week.
Initially, the change will go nearly undetected. Next week, just 100 homes with DVRs will become part of Nielsen's sample of 9,000 homes from which national ratings are projected. [emphasis added]so only 9000 homes outta 110 million households determine what we watch?
just like the guy in the fedex commercial, slate's fred kaplan is always wrong...
For a brief spell a few weeks ago, President Bush departed from his monochromatic view that the Iraqi insurgents consisted entirely of Saddamists aching for a comeback and jihadist terrorists aiming for a caliphate. He acknowledged a third—and much larger—group: "ordinary Iraqis" who simply oppose occupation. Now he seems to have dropped the complexity. "The mission of American troops," he said in Sunday night's speech, has been "fighting Saddam loyalists and foreign terrorists."is kaplan suggesting President Bush publicaly state that the "mission of the American troops" is to fight "ordinary Iraqis"?
The omission of the third group—those who are fighting strictly against the occupation—is not a small matter. To ignore this group is to misunderstand the insurgency's dynamic, the main ingredient of its appeal, and the dilemma that underlies the stateside debate over whether to withdraw U.S. troops. [emphasis added]
evidence mounts that the news media is out-of-touch, overly pessimistic, self-satisified (even if not warranted)...
It could also damage journalism. The journalists who write these stories about people who can't afford to live in New York can't afford to live in New York, either. And that's a trend that may prove just as corrosive to establishment media as any disruptive technology.or bogus reporting like nyt jayson blair, cbs memogate, cnn eason jordan saying military targets journalists,.... there's just too many corrosive elements
Journalists have long suffered from what David Brooks...identified as status-income disequilibrium. Journalists received low wages compared to many of their peers and neighbors but enjoyed higher prestige and job security.one would think the prestige and job security would be enough to offset the perceived "low wages".
Most experienced reporters and editors at the publications in question earn salaries in the low six figures. They can expect salaries to rise by a few percentage points a year, if they're lucky. Salaries that barely pierce six figures certainly aren't insulting to most Americans. But everything is relative. A couple doing quite well—he's an editor at the Journal, she's a reporter at the Times—could make up to $250,000. But after New York taxes, New York child care, and New York housing, you're not left with much. In New York City, you can't buy a co-op or a condo with only 10 percent down. In most desirable suburbs, you can't buy a starter house for less than $700,000. When children arrive, the couple has to choose between living in an expensive town with good public schools (which means long, painful commutes), or the prospect of private-school tuition at $25,000 per kid per year. Given the types of lives many journalists wish to lead—and think they're entitled to lead by virtue of their education and positions—the wages aren't anywhere near sufficient. [emphasis added]the best part is when Gross concludes that NY journos may be "bourgeois and ambitious"...
the late night talk show is a tough, fickle business...
given the often slanted reporting, public perception of media bias remains well-founded...
"One thing people should keep in mind is that our data for the Drudge Report was based almost entirely on the articles that the Drudge Report lists on other Web sites," said Groseclose. "Very little was based on the stories that Matt Drudge himself wrote. The fact that the Drudge Report appears left of center is merely a reflection of the overall bias of the media."quite unsurprisingly, the judgement of the MSM
"[A]lmost all major media outlets tilt to the left."of particular note, is the attempt to compare news outlets with corresponding members of congress like senator joe lieberman, former senator john breaux
The researchers took numerous steps to safeguard against bias — or the appearance of same — in the work, which took close to three years to complete. They went to great lengths to ensure that as many research assistants supported Democratic candidate Al Gore in the 2000 election as supported President George Bush. They also sought no outside funding, a rarity in scholarly research.interesting all around
[snip]
The results break new ground.
"Past researchers have been able to say whether an outlet is conservative or liberal, but no one has ever compared media outlets to lawmakers," Groseclose said. "Our work gives a precise characterization of the bias and relates it to known commodity — politicians."
studies (FWIW) of embryo implantation suggest the use of one embryo yields better results in terms of risk-reward. implantation and birth rates were similar whether one or more embryos were used. however, the use of a single embryo led to less risky pregnancies than multiple embryos.
another championship fight, another controversy...
with the loss of the previously undefeated colts...
for those people who've contracted STD's, and have difficulty breaking the news to people, their prayers have been answered...
ny state attorney general eliot spitzer, certainly knows how to garner headlines, but not necessarily win cases.
slate's fred kaplan has an astonishing record on international affairs....
a korean scientist went public with a stem cell breakthrough about 6 months back.
If the work does prove to be largely fraudulent, it will be a major scientific setback for one of the most talked-about new avenues of biomedical research. It could also be a major political setback for the field, which has long been mired in controversy because it depends on the creation and destruction of human embryos.unfortunately, chicanery like this may dissuade funding and support for future research
i often use wikipedia as a quick reference...
arizona driver Candace Dickinson comes up with a novel excuse for driving in that car pool lane despite no apparent passenger....
kazakhstan has had enough with sasha baron cohen's hijinx, utilizing official means to combat borat's silliness.
following the lead of Bombay, Madras and Calcutta, the 'silicon valley of india' Bangalore will change it's name to Bengaluru.
despite prominent congressmen referring to the military as "broken", and open hostility by lefty cities and institutions of 'higher education'...
josh levin, slate's sports nut, examines the annoying sports media cliche to anoint the 'next larry bird'
The allure of the Bird comparison is that many of the qualities that made him great—his court vision, his anticipation, his leadership—are stereotypes associated with white basketball virtue.levin includes reference to several 'great white hopes' like the duke big men, keith van horn, euro dirk nowitzki, even former bullet faves tom gugliotta. the players suffer the burden of comparison, and even bird doesn't particularly like the whole thing.
business week online's atlanta bureau chief dean foust examines the current situation of hometown giant coca-cola.
former aol bigwig steve case left awhile back...
When the merger was announced, analysts believed that Time Warner's music, movies and magazines along with its cable systems would speed up AOL's transition from phone dial-up to broadband, and that AOL's Internet mentality would accelerate growth at Time Warner. Neither has occurred.however, he takes the decidedly contrarian view that AOL was held back by the transaction, particularly due to the lack of true integration across the merged company.
the newspaper that covers congress, the hill details some of the extravagent spending on capitol hill.
the 'see no evil, hear no evil...' policy of ebay (and internet companies in general) continues.
after the first coupla days of the saddam trial, several watchers suggest saddam has taken control of the proceedings...
i can't really explain it, but i get a sense of glee that the yankees lost loads of money this past season.
march madness fans will be even more mad this time around as cbs will stream out-of-market games over the web through elite 8 games.
the announcement of the rolling stones as super bowl half time entertaiment caused a hubbub in host city detroit.
the ny daily news looks into $20 billion of 9/11 aid money secured by NY Senators Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer
So whatever happened to the President's promise, which was later increased to $21.4 billion? And, what happened to the money we did get? Did it go to those who needed help the most? Or did some of it end up lining the pockets of the wealthy, the well-connected and hucksters who played the system?the results are "sad and disheartening." the NY senators who requested the money should have been watching, but instead alotta money went to pork projects, giveaways, and (all but) fraud.
Four years after 9/11, it is time to lift the veil of our collective sorrow and examine without sentimentality or fear of political incorrectness what was done with the generous commitment underwritten by American taxpayers.
speaking of lame media...
The job boost is the latest evidence that the U.S. economy has shaken off the ravages of hurricanes Katrina and Rita in the Gulf Coast and consequent higher gasoline and natural gas prices.but the NY Times mentions poll results [bugmenot login] suggesting bush does not get credit for the strong economy.
The government reported this week that the economy grew by a 4.3% annualized pace in the third quarter, far above the historical average near 3%. Other recent reports signaled strength in business spending, consumer confidence, new-home sales and retail sales.
An ABC News/Washington Post poll last month found that 52 percent of Americans believe that the economy is getting worse, compared with 18 percent who think it is getting better. Sixty-four percent of respondents said the economy was not good or poor. A Harris poll last month found that 68 percent of Americans believe that the country is on the wrong track. Mr. Bush's approval rating last month for his handling of the economy stood at 37 percent in an Associated Press/Ipsos poll.perhaps it's because the times all but demands the president mention iraq when talking about the economy....
Moreover, Mr. Bush and his allies ignored or glossed over statistics suggesting that the economy, in the short run as well as the long run, faced big challenges.in a wacky article, which clearly opines
By most measures, the economy appears to be doing fine. No, scratch that, it appears to be booming.despite all the silly nicknames implying credibility, the NY Times continues its slanted/biased and questionable behavior.
But as always with the United States economy, it is not quite that simple.
For every encouraging sign, there is an explanation.
ralph peters, who excellently questioned the media's coverage of military personnel numbers, continues to slaps the media in general.
A SPECTER is haunting journalism: the specter of Watergate.to make his point, Peters mentions such luminaries as Bob Woodward, Judy Miller, Dana Priest. Peters concludes
Three decades ago, two young reporters became the story and crippled American journalism.
[snip]
Overnight, journalism became an upwardly mobile profession — and our country is much the worse for it.
In place of the old healthy skepticism, we have arrogant cynicism. The highest echelons of the media and government became preserves for America's most-privileged. An Ivy League degree was the ticket to a reporting job on a major daily. And incest produced the usual ugly results.
"Mainstream" newspapers lost touch with American workers because the new breed of journalists didn't know any workers.
[snip]
The other product of the Woodward-Bernstein cult was the rise of the self-adoring conviction that journalists were above patriotism, the law and common decency.
[snip]
After Watergate, patriotism became an embarrassment among journalists. They're "citizens of the world."
As vile as Richard Nixon was, I'm no longer certain that Woodward and Bernstein did our country a service. The post-Watergate journalist's unexamined conviction that he or she is "beyond good and evil" has done far more evil than good.
Actions have consequences. Today's journalists refuse to accept that the rule applies to them. The wages of irresponsible journalism are death — for others. Expose a crucial clandestine operation, shatter a policy or wreck a struggling state, and you get a Pulitzer Prize. The motto of journalists today is "Nothing's ever our fault."
The republic suffers.
unfortunately not all kids are as productive as this one...
the story of fema's inneffectiveness has been told repeatedly. the democrats even tried to take advantage of the agency's tarnished reputation. but fema's missteps has not often been presented quite like this [bugmenot login]
The box that Jose Luis Porras Jr. refers to is a mobile home. He's glad to have a roof over his head, "but check it out," he says. "Is there any other shape to call it?"this story cannot be true...
The home is in a village of 152 trailers, divided into two clusters on the outskirts of this border town west of San Antonio. The Federal Emergency Management Agency assembled the village in the fall of 1998 to house the hundreds of evacuees, like Porras, whose houses were destroyed by a tropical storm that drenched this normally arid corner of Texas.
The village was meant to be temporary.
Seven years later, the village remains, with no plans to dismantle it. And, most disheartening for Porras, he and his family remain, along with a dozen other evacuee families who have no means of getting out.
Porras, 41, has been following the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and news of the FEMA trailer villages being built for Gulf Coast evacuees. His counsel in one sentence: Beware the word "temporary." [emphasis added]
In Washington, the common joke was that every storm brought two disasters: one when the hurricane arrived and the second when FEMA arrived.however, several families have been stuck in housing intended for 18 months for seven years
after fox reconsidered moving it's terrible but ratings behemoth american idol--perhaps as a sly pr move, nbc shakes up its line-up to bring back the must-see tv comedy line-up to thursday night.
with the shake-ups in tv anchors involving tom brokaw, dan rather, peter jennings, and just recently ted koppel, alotta avid newswatchers look ahead...
Life is tough for television news anchors these days, especially the ones who aren’t Anderson Cooper. Even Cooper’s having it rough lately; at last count, he’s down to only three or four fawning media profiles a week.forget the fact that the best cnn can say is that he's getting beat by less...or that greta outdraws him by a million viewers...cooper is doing worse than the aaron brown, the guy he replaced...
Much as the news chiefs might not want to admit it, Anderson Cooper is the best hope for the future
being one of the few statesiders to have seen the bbc's new doctor who, any news of US distribution hits my radar screen.
news/blog links - kinja - technorati - daypop - blogdex - boing boing - fark - metafilter - memeorandum - watching america - lucianne - instapundit - best of the web - oh, that liberal media - kaus files - daily kos - talking points memo - wonkette - scott rosenberg - mozilla - bugmenot - avg anti-virus - ad-aware |